Friday,
September 03, 2010
24 Elul, 5770
News
France
UK
Germany
Western Europe
Eastern Europe
EU-Israel affairs
US 2008 ELECTION
Iran - Holocaust
Conflict in Gaza
Voices
Culture
In Depth
Mideast Crisis
World Cup
On Anglo Jewry
Week at a glance
France Election
EU and Annapolis Summit
News from outside of Europe
Holocaust Remembrance Day
Mumbai Terror
DURBAN II
WILLIAMSON
Stories from our Readers
The Calendar
Links
advertisement
advertisement
LEARN HEBREW

BBC online censured for anti-Israel bias
Updated: 03/Apr/2006 18:31
Page tools
Email to friend
Print this page
Bookmark this page
Add your view
The BBC’s Board of Governors has censured the corporation’s BBC online service for a misleading article about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The article, published late last year, suggested the UN called for Israel’s unilateral withdrawal from territories seized during the six-day war when in fact it called for a negotiated "land for peace" settlement between Israel and "every state in the area".

The governors report, which specifically singled out the reporting of the UN resolution after the 1967 Israeli-Arab ’Six-day war’, stated that the piece on the BBC news website did not give a balanced view of events.

Absence of factual reporting

The UN Security Council 242 is very specific when it calls for a connection between a "withdrawal from territories" and all nations in the region’s "right to live in peace".

The wording of the resolution refers to "territories" and not "the territories" meaning that the resolution never calls on Israel to withdraw from all territory captured during the war.

At the time the British Ambassador who drafted the approved resolution, Lord Caradon said: "It would have been wrong to demand that Israel return to its positions of June 4, 1967, because those positions were undesirable and artificial.”

The BBC governors’ report concluded: "The committee considered that by selecting only references to Israel, the online article did not accurately reflect this balance and gave a biased impression. It therefore breached editorial standards on both accuracy and impartiality".

BBC under-fire

The BBC has frequently come under fire for what pro-Israel groups call biased reporting. In October 2004, BBC correspondent Barbara Plett reported on Yasser Arafat being transported to Paris for surgery said she "started to cry."

The BBC initially cleared Plett of any wrongdoing. Following an appeal, however, the BBC Board of Governors has upheld part of the complaint, stating that Plett’s comments "breached the requirements of due impartiality".

The BBC’s director of news, Helen Boaden has apologized for what she described as an "editorial misjudgment". Boaden said it appeared Plett "unintentionally gave the impression of over-identifying with Yasser Arafat and his cause".

As a result of examples such as those mentioned, the BBC board of governors appointed an independent panel to examine the corporation’s reporting of the conflict.

Chaired by Sir Quentin Thomas, the president of the British Board of Film Classification, the panel includes Lord Eames, the Archbishop of Armagh and Stewart Purvis, the former ITN chief executive.

The panel’s task is to "assess the impartiality of BBC news and current affairs coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with particular regard to accuracy, fairness, context, balance and bias, actual or perceived".

The full report will be released in the next few weeks.

Add Your View Email to friend Print this page Bookmark this page
Latest Articles
Pope wants 'respectful' deal between Israelis, Palestinians
EU official 'skeptical' about Washington talks, stresses influence of ‘Jewish lobby on Capitol Hill’
German central bank votes to exclude disputed member
Netanyahu to Abbas: 'you are my partner in peace'
Jerusalem to remain 'undivided capital of Israel', aide to Netanyahu says
France and Russia urge Mideast parties not to cede to provocation
German central bank mulls director's ouster
 
Jdate