Thursday,
February 09, 2012
16 Shevat, 5772
News
France
UK
Germany
Western Europe
Eastern Europe
EU-Israel affairs
US 2008 ELECTION
Iran - Holocaust
Conflict in Gaza
Voices
Polls
Culture
In Depth
Mideast Crisis
World Cup
On Anglo Jewry
Week at a glance
France Election
EU and Annapolis Summit
News from outside of Europe
Holocaust Remembrance Day
Mumbai Terror
DURBAN II
WILLIAMSON
Stories from our Readers
The Calendar
Links
advertisement
advertisement
wagerworks software

A new era of war
Updated: 03/Jun/2010 06:26
Page tools
Email to friend
Print this page
Bookmark this page
Add your view

The world is shocked, again, after an Israeli military action. Nevertheless it still unclear which part of the story bothered public opinion the most. Is it the fact a number of activists were killed during the operation? Or is it because of the operation itself?

 

People dying are never good news; nevertheless sometimes unfortunately this is what happens at war. Today’s war is not what is used to be, rarely states confront one another and asymmetric conflicts are the new form of war almost everywhere. So we should not be surprised to see a regular state army on the one hand and non-state actors on the other.

 

Said so, who were exactly these activist? Where they non-state actors that threatened Israel or where them, as they defined themselves, peace activist? The doubt concerning the nature of their group and their activities is exactly the reason that pushed Israel to verify what the ship was carrying. In fact as it happened already in the past, ships that were apparently peaceful were found carrying weapons and explosive, as the case of Karine-A few years ago. 

 

Once the operation started death was hard to avoid. It is difficult to believe that a soldier or a police officer or any person with or without a uniform would have not responded to a physical attack that was threatening his own life. This is exactly what happened on the ship when the IDF soldiers were attacked with knives and axes and obviously responded to save their lives.

 

Now, the question whether it was is necessary to send navy special forces to assault the ship at night in order to verify the what the vessel was carrying is the main issue. I could say that it might have been necessary from a strictly military point of view. I am not an expert on military tactics, but even I can understand that the surprise effect of an assault in the dark of the night can help any army or an armed group to succeed.

 

Notwithstanding Israel cannot anymore think in military and security terms first and then try to activate the communication machine to explain the world what truly happens. This tactic is a failure, no matter how much Special Forces are efficient and no matter how security is important. The Israeli army must think now in new military-communication terms and even military tactics should be built upon those two principles.

 

After a good start of inviting the ship into the Ashdod port and after the refusal of the activist to accept the invitation, since the situation did not seem to be such an emergency, the IDF could have surrounded the ship with its navy and waited. They could have waited for days until the ship would have either accepted to let the soldiers control the vessel or in alternative until it would have entered national waters. This way the whole world could have witnessed patience and good will of Israel that only wanted a legitimate control of the “humanitarian aid”.

 

We are in a new area, where there are no secret operations anymore and the world is ready to judge any situation according to what they see and what they already think. While keeping security as a priority, Israel must find new ways to prevent threats that can be efficient both in military terms and in public opinion terms, to make sure the democratic nature of the State of Israel is never put in doubt.

 



The author is researcher on international relations, specializing in the relations between the EU and the Middle East.
Add Your View Email to friend Print this page Bookmark this page
Daily quote

Ninety-seven saint days a year wouldn’t affect the theater, but two Yom Kippurs would ruin it

Brendan Behan, Irish author, who was born on 9 February 1923 
 
Day in history
1994: Yugoslavia

Peace plan for Bosnia and Herzegovina announced (so called Vance-Owen peace plan)
 
Latest Articles
Lee Zeitouni’s family not allowed to attend CRIF dinner
German court caps Jewish ghetto pension claims
French government walks out of parliament after 'Nazi' taunt
EU will not recall its ambassador in Damascus, ‘important to have people to follow the situation’
EU says it will continue giving money to the Palestinian Authority despite deal with Hamas
Hungarian foreign ministry condemns Jobbik MP’s comments questioning the Holocaust and comparing Israel to a Nazi system
ADL welcomes US decision to close its embassy in Damascus